Some technology hangs on long after it's needed
So we’ve rounded up a baker’s dozen of legacy technologies that no longer serve much of a purpose.
Begone, obsolete tech!
1. Parallel ATA (PATA)
Originally designed as an interface for mechanical hard drives and optical drives way back in 1986, the standard was superseded by Serial ATA (SATA) more than ten years ago.
So why is it still making appearances today?
2. PS/2 connectors
Since the ports were not designed to be hot-swappable, plugging a mouse or keyboard into a powered-up PS/2 port carries the risk of damaging your motherboard.
Today, most mice and keyboards connect via USB, so why are PS/2 ports still so common? Because some security-conscious companies disable the USB ports on their employees' computers so that the staff can’t smuggle out sensitive data on a USB thumbdrive.
I say make those corporate fat cats buy a special motherboard and save the vast majority of us some cash.
3. PCIe x1 slots
Single-lane PCIe slots are about as useful as nipples on Batman's suit.
Go away!
4. FireWire (IEEE 1394)
Despite being a high-performance technology, it never really caught on in the PC industry, and the vast majority of external hard drives use USB.
Excise it!
5. USB 2.0
So who needs USB 2.0? Let’s get rid of it!
6. eSATA
The problem with eSATA is that the cable doesn’t carry power to the external device. Internal SATA relies on two cables: one for power and one for data.
Since eSATA never caught on with consumers, and since now we have USB 3.0 and Thunderbolt (both of which are plenty fast and deliver power to attached devices), it's time to play a dirge for eSATA.
7. eSATA/USB 2.0 combo port
We applaud the innovation, but thanks to USB 3.0 and Thunderbolt, we no longer need these combo ports!
8. Memory card reader
When I need to transfer photos from my camera to my computer, I connect the two devices with a USB cable.
If I were a more frequent photographer, I’d invest in a memory card with an integrated Wi-Fi adapter and ditch the cable altogether.
Banish the memory card reader!
9. Optical drives
Who the heck rips anymore? Embrace the digital revolution! You can find plenty of online sources for both high-def movies and music these days. And the last time I bought a game on disc was 2009’s F.E.A.R.
Dump the disc drive!
10. VGA
Surely corporate America has made enough profit over the past five years to be able to afford to upgrade its boardrooms with new projectors and monitors.
Just say no to VGA!
11. DVI
Give me DisplayPort (with multi-streaming, so that I can daisy-chain several monitors) or give me death!
12. Analog surround sound
The industry tried to make the process easier for us with wireless surround speakers, but even they gave up on the concept.
If you connect speakers to your PC at all, you’re most likely going to choose a 2.1-channel system, so all you really need is a stereo output (because the crossover for the sub will be in the speakers, not in the PC). And if you really want surround sound, buy speakers with an optical input.
Whack those unused audio ports!
13. The mouse?
Touchscreens and touchpads are great and all, but I need a good rodent for playing games.
To paraphrase the late Charlton Heston, "You can pry my mouse from my cold, dead hand!"
You know most of these technologies are still around? They are there in case someone has old media that doesn't work with the newer connections. If I had an IDE drive and no PATA port, how would be able to get the data off that drive to a SATA one?
ReplyDeleteFor newer technologies that are backwards compatible (like USB 3.0), then I agree we should get rid of them, along with the PS/2, analog audio ports, and eSATA (only now I say eSATA because before USB 3.0, there was reason for it).
Finally, for video connections it's tricky. VGA is JUST NOW being accepted as a legacy connection and most manufacturer's are vowing to end the ability for VGA around 2015. Hell, even my new LG TV doesn't carry one in favor of DVI/HDMI. Now with digital video, DVI can be retired because HDMI is DVI + audio and is electronically cross-compatible.
Getting into even newer digital debate, HDMI's wiki states that Displayport is suppose to "compliment" HDMI. But it seems as HDMI is being found on video cards, then what's the use of Displayport other than daisy-chaining? HDMI 2.0 will deliver the bandwidth of what Displayport 1.2 provides, but it's ment for the Consumer electronics industry. Not the Computing Industry. HDMI is the digital answer to HDTV that has been in the computing industry since DVI. So either discontinue HDMI with PC's, or discontinue Displayport altogether... Hmm.
I forgot to say that the only reason HDMI is used in the computing industry is that people want to use bigger displays with their PC's and since Displayport is ment for monitors, HDMI is the only way to go. Not an easy problem to agree upon.
ReplyDeleter