Last week we published a teaser look at Intel's latest mSATA SSD
:
the Intel SSD 525. At the time we only presented performance for a
single 240GB drive, however Intel decided to break the mold and send us
nearly every capacity in the 525 lineup. We've finally completed
testing of the remaining capacities and can now bring you a full look at
the Intel SSD 525 lineup.
Typically manufacturers send along their best performing SSD and what
follows after launch is a bunch of begging for or outright purchase of
additional capacities in order to present the most complete picture.
Intel was one of the first companies to send along both large and small
capacity SSDs in for review, so it's no surprise that they're one of the
first to send nearly every member of a new SSD family for review. I
can't stress how important it is that other manufacturers follow in
Intel's footsteps here. Given the direct relationship between the number
of NAND die/packages on an SSD and the performance of the drive, being
able to demonstrate the performance of the entire family is very
important to those looking to make an actual buying decision.
In the case of the 525, Intel did a good job of keeping things pretty
simple. Since the 525 is exclusively an mSATA drive, there's only room
for a maximum of four NAND packages on board. The 525 still uses 25nm
2bpc MLC NAND, which is limited to 8GB of NAND per die and 8 die per
package (64GB max per NAND package). This is where the 240GB max
capacity comes from (256GB of actual NAND).
With the exception of the 90GB and 180GB drives, all of the 525s
populate all four NAND packages. The 90GB and 180GB drives are the
exception and only feature three NAND packages on board:
Intel SSD 525 180GB (top) vs. Intel SSD 525 240GB (bottom)
The full breakdown of capacities and NAND split are listed below:
| Intel SSD 525 |
| Advertised Capacity (GB) |
User Addressable Space (GiB) |
Total NAND On-board (GiB) |
% Spare Area |
NAND Packages Number/Die per Package/Package Capacity |
MSRP |
| 30GB |
27.95 GiB |
32 GiB |
12.6% |
4 / 1 / 8 GiB |
$54 |
| 60GB |
55.89 GiB |
64 GiB |
12.6% |
4 / 2 / 16 GiB |
$104 |
| 90GB |
83.82 GiB |
96 GiB |
12.6% |
3 / 4 / 32 GiB |
$129 |
| 120GB |
111.79 GiB |
128 GiB |
12.6% |
4 / 4 / 32 GiB |
$149 |
| 180GB |
167.68 GiB |
192 GiB |
12.6% |
3 / 8 / 64 GiB |
$214 |
| 240GB |
223.57 GiB |
256 GiB |
12.6% |
4 / 8 / 64 GiB |
$279 |
All of the 525 members feature the same ~12.6% spare area (~14% OP).
Despite the reduction in number of NAND packages, the 90 and 180GB
models aren't actually any slower than the 60GB and 120GB versions
respectively. The reason that performance doesn't suffer when going to
these odd sizes is because Intel/SF do a good job of parallelizing
requests across all NAND die within a package, of which there are
physically more in the 90/180GB configurations compared to the 60/120GB
models.
I went over
the rest of the details of the 525 in the initial review.
In short, the SF-2281 controller is still at use but paired with
firmware that's directed/validated by Intel. Performance, compatibility
and stability can be different on the 525 compared to other drives that
use SandForce's SF-2281 controller. The 525 in particular uses a newer
version of the Intel branch of the SF-2281 firmware with additional
stability/compatibilty enhancements and power optimizations. The 525's
LLKi firmware revision hasn't been backported to the 520/330/335 and as
of now there aren't any public plans to do so. The 525 also comes with a
5-year warranty from Intel.
Performance of the 525 is very similar to the 2.5" Intel SSD 520 that
came before it, the big difference here is the physical size of the
drive as the 525 is mSATA only. For all testing we used an mSATA to SATA
adapter:
No comments:
Post a Comment